Skip to main content
ATPL Training logoATPL Training
ATPL theory exams · subject difficulty · 033

Is Flight Planning & Monitoring (033) Hard? And Can You Memorise It?

Hard if sat early, much more manageable sat late: it is the syllabus’s great integrator, drawing on Meteorology, Mass & Balance and Performance.

Last updated

Exam

43 questions

In 120 minutes, at the standard 75% pass mark.

Study load

upper end

Of the rough 40–80 h/subject planning range — it is a range, not a promise.

Sit alongside

See pairing

Affinity guidance below — matched to our in-app planner.

Flashcards in the exam

Permitted*

*At Austro Control — see the note below.

What Flight Planning & Monitoring (033) actually covers

ICAO and ATC flight plans, fuel planning, ETOPS, alternate selection, en-route planning and the NAT track system.

A long exam (120 minutes for 43 questions) because the fuel-planning and chart problems are genuinely time-consuming.

For the full topic-by-topic syllabus breakdown, see the Flight Planning & Monitoring subject guide.

Typical study hours — honestly

Any single number here would be false precision, so we won’t give one. As a rough planning figure, most self-study candidates allocate 40–80 hours per subject, and students report Flight Planning & Monitoring typically sitting toward the upper end of that range. Long, multi-step problems plus dependence on three other subjects put it at the upper end — especially if those prerequisites are not yet solid.

Your own figure depends on background, maths comfort and whether you are studying full-time — treat the range as a budget to adjust, not a target to hit.

Memorise vs understand: where Flight Planning & Monitoring really sits

The fuel-policy rules and flight-plan codes need memorising; the planning problems do not reward it. The same community observation applies here as in Performance: "every calculation is on the (concept)" — method over answer-recognition.

The most effective preparation is sequencing: sit 033 after Meteorology (050), Mass & Balance (031) and Performance (032), and most of its content is revision rather than new learning.

Common traps that cost marks

▸Sitting it early — the classic sequencing mistake. It depends on 050, 031 and 032.
▸Fuel-planning questions where one missed contingency or alternate requirement shifts every subsequent number.

Which subjects to sit alongside it

Not an affinity pairing but a prerequisite chain: schedule Flight Planning after Meteorology (050), Mass & Balance (031) and Performance (032). See the order-of-study guide.

How the pairings fit into a full plan — and why order matters — is covered in the recommended order of study, with the sitting mechanics in sittings & limits.

The detail nobody mentions

Austro Control permits flashcards in the Flight Planning & Monitoring (033) exam — per Austro Control’s own FAQ, flashcards are allowed in subjects 031, 032, 033, 034 and 061. If you are sitting with Austro Control, building a clean flashcard set for this subject is study time that walks into the exam room with you. Other authorities set their own rules — confirm before assuming.

Important: Exam question counts and durations are set per authority and periodically revised, and difficulty reports are exactly that — student reports, not guarantees. Confirm current exam details with your ATO and authority before planning.

Frequently asked questions

Is EASA ATPL Flight Planning & Monitoring (033) hard?

Hard if sat early, much more manageable sat late: it is the syllabus’s great integrator, drawing on Meteorology, Mass & Balance and Performance.

Can you just memorise Flight Planning & Monitoring for the ATPL exam?

The fuel-policy rules and flight-plan codes need memorising; the planning problems do not reward it. The same community observation applies here as in Performance: "every calculation is on the (concept)" — method over answer-recognition. The most effective preparation is sequencing: sit 033 after Meteorology (050), Mass & Balance (031) and Performance (032), and most of its content is revision rather than new learning.

How long does it take to study ATPL Flight Planning & Monitoring?

It is a range, and it genuinely varies by background — as a rough planning figure, most self-study candidates allocate 40–80 hours per subject, and students report Flight Planning & Monitoring typically sits toward the upper end of that range. Long, multi-step problems plus dependence on three other subjects put it at the upper end — especially if those prerequisites are not yet solid.

Which subjects should I sit alongside Flight Planning & Monitoring?

Not an affinity pairing but a prerequisite chain: schedule Flight Planning after Meteorology (050), Mass & Balance (031) and Performance (032). See the order-of-study guide.

The other 12 subjects

More in this series

Find out how ready you actually are in Flight Planning & Monitoring

Drill Flight Planning & Monitoring (033) questions with per-topic mastery tracking, spaced-repetition review, and timed mock exams at the real 75% pass mark.